Category: Messages from the Chairman

  • Now is the Time to Declare our Independence

    Now is the Time to Declare our Independence



    It is time for Patriots to stand up and be counted. The change is occurring.

    THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.

    The American Crisis No. 1 by Thomas Paine.

    It has become undeniable that the uniparty is acting without concern for what is good for America, without concern for the Rights of American individuals, and without any care of what American Citizens want or need.

    The uniparty shills out its promises at election time and delivers more debt, less freedoms, and an overburdensome, bloated, inefficient government. Americans deserve better.

    But to get the better that is secured by our Constitution, Americans must stand up for themselves and put our public functionaries back in their places. It is time for Patriots to get into the war for our Freedom.

    The first thing that must be done politically, is for Patriots to reject the uniparty and the “two-party” system that is holding many prisoner.

    It is time for voters and Statesmen to walk away! It is time for voters to register elsewhere and break the stranglehold of the DEMGOP on the political arena.

    The first thing that must be done politically, is for Patriots to reject the uniparty and the “two-party” system that is holding many prisoner. It is time for voters and Statesmen to walk away! It is time for voters to register elsewhere and break the stranglehold of the DEMGOP on the political arena.

    This year we are seeing a great shift in voter sentiment as the uniparty consistently fails to represent their constituents. People are feeling the pain and are recognizing that the things they prioritize are not being prioritized by their party. We are seeing more viable candidates from outside the uniparty. We are seeing voter sentiment receding from the uniparty.

    2026 will be the #TippingPoint. Join the fight, it is worth the price of #Freedom.

    Constitution Party National Committee:

    16 May 2026, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for the people of a nation to break free from the political structures that no longer serve them, and to reclaim their rightful power as citizens, respect for the opinions of the Nation demands that they explain why.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all people are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights — including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That governments, and the political systems that shape them, exist to protect these rights, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed. That whenever a political system becomes corrupt, entrenched, and destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to establish new systems that better reflect their needs, values, and hopes.

    Prudence indeed will dictate that political systems long established should not be changed for light or fleeting causes; and experience has shown that people are often more willing to endure frustrations and disappointments than to challenge deeply rooted systems. But when a long train of abuses and failures shows a clear pattern of placing party loyalty, corporate interests, and political survival over the rights of individuals, it is the right — it is the duty — of the people to throw off such systems, and to create new political pathways for their future.

    The history of the Democratic and Republican Parties is a history of repeated failures to address the needs of the people and repeated prioritization of power over principle. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world:

    • They have entrenched a two-party monopoly that stifles competition, suppresses alternative voices, and denies voters meaningful choice.
    • They have fueled bitter polarization, dividing communities, families, and the nation, not for the people’s benefit, but for their own political gain.
    • They have prioritized corporate donors and special interests over the needs of working people, and small businesses.
    • They have acted unconstitutionally on unsubstantiated threats like climate change, economic inequality, healthcare access, and gun violence, to limit individual freedom.
    • They have undermined trust in our republican form of government by gerrymandering, facilitating voter fraud, and introducing reforms like ranked-choice voting and campaign finance fraud.
    • They have made performative gestures while avoiding meaningful structural change, focusing on political point-scoring instead of solving problems.
    • They have weaponized fear, misinformation, and media echo chambers to manipulate public opinion and cling to power.
    • They have made it nearly impossible for independent or third-party candidates to compete on a level playing field, locking the system to their advantage.

    We have called upon them, time and again, to reform — to open the political process, to listen to the voices of the people, to place country over party. But they have responded with gridlock, empty promises, or further entrenchment. A political establishment that refuses accountability and change is no longer fit to lead a free people.

    We, therefore, the independent citizens of the United States, do solemnly declare that we are free and independent from the Democratic and Republican Parties — that we do not recognize any monopoly they think they have over our lives; that we claim the right to build new parties and movements, to support independent candidates, and to restore our republic to truly reflect constitutional principles.

    And for the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the principles of justice, equality, and self-determination, we mutually pledge to each other our time, our energy, and our unwavering commitment to a better future.

    Sign Your Name Here

  • URGENT: Congress May Soon Vote on NDAA Section 219

    URGENT: Congress May Soon Vote on NDAA Section 219



    Congress may soon vote on H.R. 8800, the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Buried within the bill is Section 219, creating a permanent United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative within the Department of Defense. Once the House adopts a new rule, the NDAA could return to the floor with little notice. The time for citizen engagement is now.

    Why This Matters

    Section 219 establishes a permanent framework for defense-technology cooperation in artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, quantum technologies, missile defense, cyber and electronic warfare, directed energy, biotechnology, and defense-industrial cooperation. The concern is not that it transfers command authority or formally merges the armed forces. Rather, it creates deep statutory integration without the treaty process, dedicated hearings, or a recorded vote. Whatever one’s position on Israel, these constitutional questions deserve open debate.

    • Contact your U.S. Representative and urge opposition to Section 219. (Capitol switchboard 202-224-3121)
    • Ask your Representative to support a recorded vote on removing Section 219.
    • Contact both U.S. Senators and urge opposition to the Senate companion provision, Section 1217. (Capitol switchboard 202-224-3121)
    • Ask each Member of Congress to publicly state his or her position.

    Tell your Congressmen to:

    "Oppose Section 219 and 1217 of the National Defense Authorization Act. It violates the Constitution's treaty requirements and has no dedicated hearings or recorded votes. America's defense technology should be America first, not integrated with any other country."

    Read the Legislation for Yourself

    The Constitution Party encourages every citizen to examine the actual legislative language before forming an opinion. Official bill text: H.R. 8800 – National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027

    Search within the document for:

    SEC. 219. UNITED STATES-ISRAEL DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION INITIATIVE

    (Use Ctrl+F (Windows/Linux) or Command+F (Mac) to jump directly to the provision.)


    An example letter below is provided by one of our leadership members:

    The Honorable Josh Hawley
    United States Senate
    381 Russell Senate Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510


    RE: Oppose Section 1217 of the FY2027 NDAA and House Section 219


    Dear Senator Hawley,

    I am writing as a Missouri constituent to ask you to oppose Section 1217 of the Senate committee-reported Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act and Section 219 of H.R. 8800. These provisions would establish a permanent United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative, creating standing machinery for bilateral research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, industrial cooperation, acquisition, joint training, and information-sharing across artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, quantum technologies, missile defense, directed energy, cyber and electronic warfare, biotechnology, data fusion, and other emerging technologies.

    The legislation does not formally place American forces under foreign command. The constitutional concern is nevertheless substantial: it would institutionalize deep defense-technological and industrial integration with a foreign sovereign through ordinary legislation embedded in a must-pass bill, rather than through a transparent process proportionate to the commitment. In the House version, reporting requirements end after 2030 while the initiative itself has no sunset.

    I respectfully ask you to:

    1. Publicly state your opposition to Senate Section 1217 and House Section 219.

    2. Support an amendment striking Section 1217 from the Senate bill and insist upon a recorded vote.

    3. Urge Senate leadership not to include this permanent initiative in any managers’ package or final conference agreement.

    4. Vote against final passage of an NDAA that retains either provision without separate debate and a recorded vote.

    Whatever one’s view of Israel, the national defense of the United States must remain solely under American constitutional authority, with Congress answerable to the People for every enduring foreign commitment. This issue deserves far more scrutiny than it has received.
    Please provide a written response stating your position and the action you intend to take.


    Respectfully, [sign your name]

  • What is the Purpose of Government?

    What is the Purpose of Government?



    The way we answer this question determines what we allow government, and our public functionaries, to do. The answer to this question is what we hold up against campaign rhetoric and legislative bills. It is what we should be basing our calls for government action on.

    So, what is the purpose of government?

    Webster’s 1828 – American Dictionary of the English Language states:

    “GOV’ERNMENT 4. The system of polity in a state; that form of fundamental rules and principles by which a nation or state is governed, or by which individual members of a body politic are to regulate their social actions; a constitution, either written or unwritten, by which the rights and duties of citizens and public officers are prescribed and defined; as a monarchial government or a republican government.

    Thirteen governments thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without the pretence of miracle or mystery, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind.”

    Our founding Declaration of Independence states what the purpose of government is in America: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness —That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.”

    The purpose of government is to secure our Individual Rights!

    Do we live our lives in agreement with this Declaration? Do we demand that government secure Individual Rights, or do we demand that government violate Individual Rights to give us “safety and security?”

    When politicians promise to give us things, or deliver the pork, are we upset and calling them on the carpet to correct them, or do we grab all the entitlements we can and demand more?

    When public functionaries, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, are encouraged by ‘We the People’ to “legally” plunder us, very few will resist the temptation.

    Americans must ask themselves whether they support defending Individual Rights; and they must be honest with themselves about their answer to that question and whether their words and actions line up with that answer.

    What do you truly believe is the purpose of government? Beliefs lead to actions, and actions (and inactions) have natural consequences. Good intentions never negate the consequences of bad or poorly thought-out actions.

  • The Uniparty is Out; America is Back In

    The Uniparty is Out; America is Back In



    America 250 Fund Drive

    When in the course of human events we find ourselves once again being told by a tyrannical government that we must do whatever the government tells us, it is once again time to defend our God-given rights and limit our government. The uniparty has indoctrinated many with the belief that there is no choice but to vote for them and that a vote for anyone else is a “wasted vote” or a vote for the “other team.” Their bipartisan efforts to keep voter options limited is only surpassed by their bipartisan efforts to suppress our individual rights and take our money.

    “But, pardon me, my fellow citizens, I know you want not zeal or fortitude. You will maintain your rights or perish in the generous struggle. However, difficult the combat, you never will decline it when freedom is the prize.”

    Dr. Joseph Warren ~ Delivered at Boston, 6 March 1775

    The Democratic and Republican parties are happy to use voters to maintain power, but they have grown completely tone deaf to the needs of their supporters. And they are losing major supporters as they push out those who object to the waste and abuse.

    • Tucker Carlson recently announced his leaving the Republican party.
    • Marjorie Taylor Greene has also announced that she is done with Republican party.
    • Thomas Massie was primaried when he stood for principles over party.

    Everyday Americans have had enough. The youth are avoiding the uniparty and registering independent in record numbers. We have a growing opportunity…and the Constitution Party is capitalizing on it!

    In New Hampshire, the Constitution Party has an opportunity gain ballot access, and gain recognized party status, through the efforts of the CP of NH and their 2026 U.S. Senate candidate, Edmond Laplante. We are currently raising funds and volunteers to assist in his signature gathering of 3,000 signatures to be placed on the general ballot this fall. With only 4% of the vote, the CP of NH will give New Hampshire a third political party to combat the uniparty.

    The Constitution Party of North Carolina is also gathering signatures to regain the right for North Carolinians to register with the CP of NC and to be able to place their candidates on the ballot without having to endure the odious and enormous challenge of signature gathering for ballot recognition.

    West Virginia recently gained their ballot access and has joined the ranks of other CP States that are able to offer candidates.

    We would like to be able to offer these candidates financial support for their campaigns and assist them with advertising since they will be facing media blackouts thanks to the uniparty. We are therefore running a major fundraising campaign through the end of 2026 to expand Americans’ political options, expand the CP’s ballot access, build State Affiliates, and support our growing number of candidates.

    In honor of America’s 250th birthday, we have a goal to raise $250,000 by the end of 2026. We have an opportunity to launch a major 2028 political revolution out of the collapse of the two old dying parties by taking advantage of the immediate situation. Your support right now will have an exponential impact down the road. Will you make a commitment to freedom now?

    “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

    Patrick Henry

    “It does not take a majority to prevail … but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.

    Samuel Adams

  • The claims of “birthright citizenship” exposed.

    The claims of “birthright citizenship” exposed.



    BIRTH’RIGHT, noun [birth and right.] Any right or privilege, to which a person is entitled by birth, such as an estate descendible by law to an heir, or civil liberty under a free constitution.

    CITIZENSHIP, noun The state of being vested with the rights and privileges of a citizen.

    The term “birthright citizenship” is intentionally used to try to convince you of the legitimacy of the narrative they are pushing. The problem with their phrase is that their contrived definition denies natural law. Since citizenship is inherited from the parent, an accurate definition of birthright citizenship is “a right of citizenship descendible to the child from that child’s parent.”

    This natural law is clearly spelled by Vattel in his Law of Nations:

    The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)

    Emmerich de Vattel


    BOOK 1, CHAPTER 19: Of Our Native Country, and Several Things That Relate to It

    212. Citizens and natives.

    The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

    The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; (emphasis added) and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.

    We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. (emphasis added)

    215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country.

    It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed. By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him; (emphasis added)

    I say “of itself,” for, civil or political laws may, for particular reasons, ordain otherwise. But I suppose that the father has not entirely quitted his country in order to settle elsewhere. If he has fixed his abode in a foreign country, he is become a member of another society, at least as a perpetual inhabitant; and his children will be members of it also.

    Thus by natural law, their definition of birthright citizenship is nonsensical and in direct contradiction to natural law.

    We see this understanding of natural law citizenship inheritance reaffirmed by our Founders right after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. David Ramsay, often called the historian of the American Revolution, reiterated this in his 1789 dissertation:

    A DISSERTATION ON THE MANNER OF ACQUIRING THE CHARACTER AND PRIVILEGES OF A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES.

    PRINTED IN THE YEAR MDCCLXXXIX. David Ramsay

    4th. None can claim citizenship as a birth-right, but such as have been born since the declaration of independence, for this obvious reason: no man can be born a citizen of a state or government, which did not exist at the time of his birth. Citizenship is the inheritance of the children of those who have taken a part in the late revolution: but this is confined exclusively to the children of those who were themselves citizens. Those who died before the revolution, could leave no political character to their children, but that of subjects, which they themselves possessed. If they had lived, no one could be certain whether they would have adhered to the king or to congress. Their children, therefore, may claim by inheritance the rights of British subjects, but not of American citizens.

    Citizenship bestowed at birth is confined to the children of those who were themselves citizens. The place of birth does not change this inheritance, and if the child is born to a non-citizen, it is only the child’s place of birth and not their country.

    This understanding was reaffirmed again by the 14th Amendment: “All persons born…in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” The requirement here, for a child to be born a citizen, is the place of birth plus the citizenship of the parents. A person who is not an American citizen can be deported because they are subject to a foreign jurisdiction. Conversely, and American citizen cannot be deported because they subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

    Countries that chose not to follow the natural law did so for obvious reasons. The British laws at the time of the American Revolution declared every child born to a British subject, and every child born in any place under British rule, to be British subjects. The most obvious point to be made here is that these people were considered to be owned by the British king. This contradictory policy claimed the maximum number of humans that could be claimed for Britain. This was not an attempt to give a gift, but to capture a resource. The British government tried to maximize their human resources and then tried to maximize what they could extract from them.

    The decades leading up the American Revolutionary War were filled with British attempts to tax and control their subject here in America and the colonists defending their natural rights. The continued abuses on the colonists by a government that view them as property drove the colonists to rebel and declare their independence from Britain.

    Our current uniparty government in America has taken on the same mindset. They continue to look for ways to pile on more national debt, steal through inflation, and assert their right to tax us as they see fit. They have declared us to be a mere resource of theirs to use and abuse.

  • Founders Challenge: Declaration of Independence

    Founders Challenge: Declaration of Independence



    We invite You to Take the Founder’s Challenge!

    The words of the Declaration of Independence are powerful!

    We encourage everyone to read the Declaration of Independence. Read it out loud. Read it to others. Read it for your public functionaries.

    Join us in this exciting challenge and invite your friends, families, and local schools to do the same.

    • Read the Declaration of Independence for yourself, with your family, and with friends.
    • Do a choral reading with others at church, at school, or at other gatherings.
    • Organize a reading on the steps of your local city hall or county building.
    • Memorize the Declaration (visit A Year of Civic Repentance for more details).
    • Video record your efforts and share them on social media with the hashtag #CPFoundersChallenge so we can track and share your amazing accomplishments!

    “As to the history of the revolution, my ideas may be peculiar perhaps singular. What do we mean by the revolution? The war? That was no part of the revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The revolution was in the minds of the people, and this was effected from 1760 to 1775, in the course of fifteen years, before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington.”

    John Adams, Letter to Thomas Jefferson, August 24, 1815

  • The Shocking Taste of Freedom

    The Shocking Taste of Freedom



    The FIFA World Cup has been hosted in the USA, and individuals who have come from all over the world have been shocked at what their visit has revealed. It isn’t just the amount of freedoms that we have that has been such a shocking experience, but what those freedoms have produced.

    There have been many comments by foreign visitors, who have come for the World Cup, about the things the talking heads in their own country have told them that they have found to be untrue. They have found a welcoming, friendly environment where they have been heartily invited to taste all that our freedoms have to offer. Everything from new foods to new wilderness adventures to travel and accommodations have been on display. It has reflected well on all Americans, and we hope it causes Americans to stop and think and remember what it took to reduce government back to the point where we can experience our freedoms.

    On this 250th birthday of the United States of America, we invite all Americans to recommit themselves to self-governance, limited government, and to securing individual, God-given rights.

    But pardon me, my fellow citizens, I know you want not zeal or fortitude. You will maintain your rights or perish in the generous struggle. However, difficult the combat, you never will decline it when freedom is the prize.”


    Dr. Joseph Warren”. Delivered at Boston, 6 March 1775

  • From the Lyon’s Mouth.  War an Ode.

    From the Lyon’s Mouth. War an Ode.



    The Pennsylvania Ledger: Or the Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, & New-Jersey Weekly Advertiser

    Printed by James Humphreys, Jr.

    POET’s CORNER.

    15 June 1776

    From the Lyon’s Mouth.
    WAR an ODE.

    ON all these dreary plains,
    There yet a sorrowing Muse remains,
    Who has seen with weeping eye,
    These former domes of love and joy,
    Happiness, contentment, case,
    And Freedom cloth’d in robes of peace,
    Where the Graces us’d to play,
    Now fallen desolation’s prey;

    With her I’ll view the scene of blood
    And destruction, that pursued
    The tracts of Mars, stern God of war,
    When, riding in his brazen car;
    Drawn by horses swift as wind,
    With all the furies close behind,
    And civil discord in his train
    He took his way o’er heaps of slain.

    First, shrouded in the veil of night,
    To Lexington we’ll take our flight.
    Borne on fancy’s rapid pinions,
    Swift I fly through liquid regions,
    Already do I see the ground
    On which, her brows with cypress bound,
    Britain’s genius mournful view’d
    Her children shed each other’s blood.

    Sudden darkness round is spread,
    Hark! What roaring peals of thunder!
    See the forked lightning fly!
    The bodies of the mighty dead,
    Their icy bands have burst assunder,
    And, in silent majesty,
    Rising from their tomb,
    Stalk along the awful gloom.

    Oh! from this more than deepest night
    Quickly let us take our flight;
    Swift as thought, convey’d through air,
    I stand on Abr’am’s fatal plain,
    Soft pity sheds a tender tear,
    To think how many heroes, slain,
    In the pride of youthful bloom,
    On this spot have found a tomb.

    Ah me! what hosts in dread array
    Towards yonder City bend their way.
    Hark! the angry cannons sound;
    Nought but flame and smoak is seen,
    Streams of blood bedew the ground,
    Alas! how horrid is the scene.

    Here the Son, his Parent’s pride,
    The only comfort of their age,
    On the field all crimson dy’d,
    Feels the Tyrant’s keenest rage,
    Here the bleeding Father lies,
    His Widow’s and his Orphan’s cries
    Assault his dying ear,
    And fills his soul with deep despair.

    Here the Patriot bends beneath
    His wounds all honest on the breast,
    He feels the approaching hand of death,
    And with groaning sinks to rest,
    That eye is clos’d in endless night
    Which late flash’d terror round,
    The arm so terrible in fight
    Now helpless lies upon the ground.

    Here the Lover seeking fame,
    Meets a glorious death;
    While his much lov’d Mistress’s name
    Sounds upon his last breath.
    Be calm, my tortur’d Soul, he cries,
    Ye boisterous winds your raging cease,
    Least my dreary, mournful sighs
    Wound my fair Amanda’s peace.

    But let some gentle breathing Zephyr,
    In the softest, tenderest whisper,
    Convey the tidings to her ear;
    The drop, if she does drop a tear
    Oh! let some little Cherub save,
    And borne on pity’s downy wing,
    The pearly treasure bring,
    And cast it on my grave.

    Most happy men! your troubles cease,
    Your souls are fled to realms of peace;
    Beyond a cruel Monarch’s power,
    In some blest Elysian Bower,
    Where bloody Tyrants ne’er can come;
    Perhaps ye read your Country’s doom.
    Oh! say, will never peace return?
    Ah! are we ever doom’d to mourn?

    Self whisp’ring reason tells me no,
    Our sorrows soon will cease to flow;
    Peace again will bless this shore,
    Smiling Freedom will return,
    And horrid war no more
    Shall cause this land to mourn.
    The Almighty’s self will interpose
    This scene of blood to close.


    Read More:

    Declaration Stories

  • The Committee of Five

    The Committee of Five



    “If ever the Time should come, when vain and aspiring Men shall possess the highest Seats in Government, our Country will stand in Need of its experienced Patriots to prevent its Ruin.”

    Samuel Adams

    On June 11, 1776, the Continental Congress selected five men to serve on a committee for drafting a Declaration of Independence in accordance with the resolves proposed by Richard Henry Lee. The Committee of Five, John Adams of Massachusetts, Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, Robert R. Livingston of New York, and Roger Sherman of Connecticut, were chosen for this task.

    The Committee of Five discussed the structure it should follow, then asked Thomas Jefferson, the Virginian, to prepare a draft of the declaration. Thomas Jefferson’s first draft was then discussed and minor edits made by the committee.

    The Committee of Five would present their proposed declaration to the Continental Congress on June 28, 1776.

    In Congress, July 4, 1776

  • The Lee Resolves

    The Lee Resolves



    “If ever the Time should come, when vain and aspiring Men shall possess the highest Seats in Government, our Country will stand in Need of its experienced Patriots to prevent its Ruin.”

    Samuel Adams

    On June 7, 1776, Richard Henry Lee proposed several resolves in the Continental Congress. These resolves set the stage for the American Colonies to finally separate from Great Britain. And while the Continental Congress did not immediately vote on Lee’s resolves, after some discussion it did move forward with appointing three committees (one for each piece of the resolves) to begin constructing the documents required by the resolves.

    Many delegates to the Continental Congress wanted to correspond with the legislatures that sent them, to get instructions on how to proceed. The delegates were generally agreed that this was the only recourse left to the Colonies, but things needed to proceed in an orderly, legal fashion.

    The resolves by Lee were clear and clean as to independence and as to the next steps to take.

    Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

    That it is expedient forthwith to take the most effectual measures for forming foreign Alliances.

    That a plan of confederation be prepared and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their consideration and approbation.



    16 May 2026, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Resolution to Separate from the Tyranny of the Democratic and Republican Parties